The Schemes for Replacing National Sovereignty With World Government

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

In the book of Genesis Chapter 11 we find the Biblical account of the first attempt at world government. After the time of Noah, the ark, and the flood everyone spoke one language. Nimrod the King of Babel and his followers decided to build a city and a tower so high it would reach to heaven in open defiance to God. The city of Babel and the tower were to become the capital of their world government.  The Lord saw that the people were of one language, supported by Nimrod, and knew that nothing would stop them from any kind of evil that they imagined. So the Lord changed their one language into many so they could not understand one another. He forced them to move from Babel in the land of Shinar to areas all over the world and form separate nations with different languages. The partially built tower and city was called Babel (the Hebrew word for confusion) because the Lord had confounded or confused their language.  Unfortunately the Satanic inspired dream of world government did not die with Nimrod and his followers.  History is full of failed attempts and many groups including the Illuminati founded in 1776 have had as one of their main objectives the goal of world government.

THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: FOUNDED TO PROMOTE WORLD GOVERNMENT

In 1921 The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) were founded to promote world government and their efforts lead to the founding of the United Nations in 1945.  The failure of the U.N. to persuade member nations to fully surrender their independence and national sovereignty has led to the drive to convince nations to give up their independence to regional “Unions” that will in the future combine under the United Nations. What follows is a short history of how this has happened in Europe and is likely to happen to us unless the American people wake up.

In 1942 during WWII Hitler and his economic minister Albert Speer came up with a plan to unite all of Europe. The goal was to have one European state, one central bank and one currency all under the name of the European Economic Community.  Hitler lost his battle for a united Europe but his dream did not die with him.  Socialists who rose to power after Naziism was defeated kept the idea alive. It began shortly after WWII.

In 1951 the Treaty of Paris established a relatively small coal and steel agreement among six Western European countries.  In 1958, 13 years after the death of Naziism, they named their six nation group the European Economic Community — the same name used by Albert Speer.  It was informally called the common market.  In 1973 several other nations joined and the name of this increasingly political entanglement became the European Community.  When the number of countries grew to 12 in 1986, the European flag began to be used by the Community. The European Union was formally established in 1993 when the Maastricht Treaty went into effect.  The 28 member nations of the EU have now lost most of their independence and control of foreign policy, armed forces, legal systems, trade, immigration, and national currencies.

A FOUNDER’S SAGE ADVICE IS IGNORED

President George Washington in his farewell address to the nation said that “The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.  So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith.  Here let us STOP.  Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation.  Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. ..  Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course…. Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation?  Why quit our own to stand on foreign ground?  Why by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour or caprice. Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with any portion of the foreign world.”

THE NAFTA TRAVESTY

Our Congress ignored Washington’s advice and the U. S. joined the World Trade Organization in 1995 and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1994.  Since 1994 we have lost nearly 5 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S. Unaccountable judges in NAFTA tribunals have awarded $360 million from taxpayers to foreign firms.  In 1993 we had a 1.66 Billion trade surplus with Mexico and since 2010 we have been running 60 Billion annual trade deficits, because Chrysler, Ford, GM and other companies have transferred production plants to Mexico. Following another dismal jobs report on Feb 5 2016  Ford announced on Feb. 8th it is building another auto plant in Mexico to double  it’s 2015 production by 2018  costing many more U.S. jobs.   In 1993 our annual trade deficit with Canada was 10.7 Billion and by 2005 it had risen to 78.4 Billion.  

The Federal government’s own program known as Trade Adjustment Assistance had by 2010 certified over 720,000 jobs lost in America due to NAFTA.   Under NAFTA and WTO our food imports have doubled, while federal inspection dropped to 0.6 percent.  Foreign tainted food and products have become widespread, especially from WTO partner China.

As we have found out the hard way free trade is not free at all and it certainly is not fair trade.  In fact Lewis Lloyd in his book “Tariffs: the case for protection” written in 1955 listed eight conditions that must be met to truly have free trade.  Among them were a single monetary system, uniform business laws, uniform wage rates, maximum labor mobility (no immigration laws) and lastly you must have world government.  Karl Marx the author of the Communist Manifesto said” Free trade breaks up old nationalities… In a word, the free trade system hastens social revolution”.  Marx felt that free trade and social revolution were essential steps in breaking down the old social order based on Biblical principles so that his goal of world government could be achieved.

THE CFR ADMITS THEIR INTENTIONS

In 1974 Council on Foreign Relations member Richard Gardner penned an article for the CFR journal Foreign Affairs entitled “The hard road to World Order.”  He said since hopes for instant world government have proven illusory, the best hope for  building the house of world order lay in a long range “end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece”. This could best be done, he noted, on an ad hoc basis with treaties and international “arrangements” on environment, trade and security.

With NAFTA as a stepping stone, North American leaders lead by President Bush in 2005 signed the Security and Prosperity Partnership whose goal would be to integrate Mexico Canada and the U.S. into one nation, Erasing national borders, and American independence.  Grassroots organizations banded together  to expose their plans and their effort to create a North American Union much like the European Union has been stopped at least for now.

Having seen the bad economic results from NAFTA and it’s eroding of our national sovereignty, you would think that Congress would be withdrawing us from this “free trade agreement.”  Instead many in Congress are promoting two more free trade agreements.  President Obama asked Congress for “fast track” Trade Promotion Authority so that he can negotiate and sign these two trade partnership agreements, one with eleven Pacific Rim nations known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership and another with the European Union known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership.  On January 7, 2015 Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pledged to move full speed ahead to grant the President fast track authority. McConnell told reporters “It’s an enormous grant of power, obviously, from a Republican Congress to a Democratic President, but that’s how much we believe in trade as an important part of America’s economy.”

NEVER MIND OUR CONSTITUTION

It is also an unconstitutional grant of power since Article 1 Section 8 says only Congress is to regulate commerce with foreign nations. McConnell knows full well that only 5 out of 29 chapters in the TPP agreement have to do with trade.  The other 24 will impose on us a myriad of laws and regulations onto businesses and citizens enforced by unaccountable international governmental bodies.  He also knows that the TTIP will tie us into the EU which would like nothing more than to have access to U.S. taxpayers’ dollars to bail out its failing economy.

On May 22 the Senate easily passed TPA 62-37 with only 5 Senators of the Republican majority voting NO and opposing McConnell.  On June 15th the House passed TPA 219-211 with 194 Republicans and only 28 Democrats voting for it.  The Republican majority could have easily defeated this unconstitutional transfer of Congressional responsibility but the House leadership of John Boehner, Paul Ryan and Cathy McMorris Rodgers worked very hard to deliver the fast track authority of TPA to the Obama Administration.  With the TPA law passed the Obama Administration went full speed into the TPP negotiations that led to the October 5th announcement that the U.S. and the 11 other Pacific Rim nations had reached an agreement on the TPP.  On November 5th the full text of the TPP was released and on the same day President Obama notified Congress of his intent to sign the agreement.

PROBABLY OUR NATION’S MOST IMPORTANT VOTE EVER IS LOOMING

The TPA law says the president must give Congress 90 days notice before he actually signs it which he did on Feb 4th in New Zealand and then he must wait 30 days (March 3rd) before submitting it to Congress for approval.  Until Nov 5th Congress was only be able to see bits and pieces of the highly secretive text of the TPP that the Obama administration has been working on for 5 years.   On the same day that the full text of this massive 5554 page agreement was released Senator Jeff Sessions said “My fears Confirmed.” (Picture above TPP text sitting on Sen. Session’s desk.)  He said after reading Article 27 of the TPP that it creates a powerful European Union style commission that can appoint unelected bureaucrats, change the agreement after adoption, add new members and address new issues as they evolve.  Sessions warns that the TPP commission would have the power to evolve this partnership into a Pacific Union that would destroy the independence of the United States.  This has happened in Europe as documented above.

A REALISTIC APPRAISAL OF THE TPP

A recent Tufts University study concludes that passage of the TPP would shrink our gross domestic product by $100 Billion and cause the loss of 448,000 more American jobs. With 5554 pages of new regulations on business, the creation of additional international courts, new environmental restrictions in Article 20 and the Article 10 requirement that we allow more immigration of foreign workers.  I would not be surprised if the job losses will not be greater.  Yet my Congresswoman Cathy McMorris Rodgers in a recent letter still has promoted the TPP saying it will provide jobs and economic growth to eastern Washington as well as giving us greater influence in the world. She also voted last June to support the World Trade Organization’s effort to end Country of Origin Labeling which means we now will have no idea where our beef, pork, and chicken are coming from.  She also voted to support The Omnibus Spending Bill for 2016 that funds Obama’s amnesty and foreign workers programs, as well as Syrian Muslim resettlement, Planned Parenthood and much more unconstitutional spending.  She is following the Republican Leadership line and we need to convince her to follow Washington’s advice to stay clear of permanent alliances  and obey the Constitution or we  may very well end up losing our national independence  and our individual freedoms  as Senator Sessions  has warned and has happened to the people of Europe.  

The picture at the top of this article is the official poster of the European Union Parliament showing the people of Europe rebuilding the Tower of Babel with the official motto” many tongues one voice.”  The Satanic Conspirators behind the United Nations, the European Union, the TPP and the TTIP know exactly what they are doing.  This future Tower of Babel sitting on Senator Session’s desk could become a reality unless it is rejected by the Congress of the United States.  Please contact your Congressman and Senators and convince them to vote NO on the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Most of the information in this article came from flyers and reprints from the New American magazine as well as the book International Merger by Foreign Entanglements written by Arthur Thompson.  These and other resources that can be used to educate yourself, your friends and especially your Congressmen and Senators can be found at jbs.org.

Also, see: With TPP Signed, Opposition Explodes Across Political Spectrum

Join the Discussion