Many questions surround the recent trial and conviction of former President Trump. The trial itself was not related to any behavior while in office, but rather through his business dealings as a private citizen prior to taking office. Most likely the group of suspected conspirators, both within and outside of the White House, are dancing with glee, thinking they have succeeded in taking down an opponent who they perceive as a threat to their continued omniscient power.
But the joke will be on them. Nothing happened to Trump.
Matthew Lyon, a Jeffersonian and “champion of the common man against the wealthy, well-educated Federalists”, was a Vermont elected representative to Congress from 1797 to 1801, and then from Kentucky, 1803 to 1811.
Lyons wrote scathing public letters on President Adams, attacking him for seeking power, his pompous behavior, and removing from office those who thought independently. Early in 1798, Lyon responded to a dispute with a fellow representative by spitting tobacco in his face, and later in a physical altercation. In July, after President Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts which prohibited criticism of the government, Lyon was the first person to be charged and convicted under those Acts.
During his four-month stay in jail, Lyon ran for re-election in Congress, winning by a landslide, a similar response echoed by Trump supporters today. The criticisms by Lyon’s colleagues only endeared his constituents to him more for fighting against the establishment. It would be wise to heed his urging to his constituents for a “peaceful resistance“, especially as the media today begins painting a picture of future violence by those who support Trump. For those supporters, don’t fall into this trap. Instead, get active in other ways and stay on the high ground.
In their infinite wisdom, the Founders did not include in the presidential qualifications any reference to a legal history, a point upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court. Other than the three qualification requirements, the Founders left it up to the people to decide whether one should be judged worthy as a presidential candidate.
The cabal and elitists have done this to themselves with the constant barrage of mockery towards those who have stood loyal to a man that has shown his loyalty to America. Albeit not perfect in everything he did while in office, his obvious love for his country has always been palpable.
The only difference with Trump and those who have, and continue to commit treason upon and destroy our country, is that they have been protected from retribution. It won’t always be that way. One day the power will be in the hands of those who will uphold the law.
Most will tolerate the misdeeds of Donald Trump as a private citizen over the subversive and treasonous acts upon our country by this current administration and government. So be it, even if our country has to be led from a private cell.
One reply on “To the White House Cabal, the Joke is on You”
DONALD TRUMP: VICTIM OF HIS OWN SEDITION
The Constitution’s jury system is not only completely unbiblical, it’s a crap’s game when it comes to any kind of justice, especially in any court today representing the biblically egregious Constitutional Republic.
When inaugurated as President, Trump swore allegiance to the biblically seditious Constitution as the law of the land and, thus, its unbiblical, capricious jury system as well. He’s now a victim of the same.
“…Article 3’s provision for juries is yet another instance of the framers’ deciding they knew better than Yahweh. The Bible offers nothing that resembles a jury system….
“Most Constitutionalists favor the jury system, provided jury nullification (a juror’s right to judge a law as unjust, oppressive, or inapplicable to any particular case) is in force. However, even if jury nullification were restored, juries would still render decisions based upon each jury’s collective standard of morality or immorality. “A jury drawn from the [Biblically] uninstructed population is no better equipped to administer the just requirements of God’s law than a corrupt judge.”35…. Although it might be argued that it only takes one juror to dissent and prevent a “railroad job,” most people lack the independence and resolution to resist the will of a majority. More often than not, today’s jurors reflect the type of people we are warned against in Exodus 23:
‘Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment.’ (Exodus 23:2)
“Juries produce, at best, erratic justice. Without Yahweh’s law as the standard, jury decisions are based upon the capricious morality of its members. Nothing demonstrates this better than Jesus’ trial by a jury of His peers with Pontius Pilate presiding. The prevailing immorality of the day demanded Jesus be crucified even though He was clearly innocent….
“The constitutional right of a trial by a jury of “impartial” peers is regarded by Americans – especially Christian Constitutionalists – as one of the last bulwarks against tyranny. If this is true, Yahweh (who is unquestionably a God of justice and liberty) would have included juries somewhere in His perfect law and righteous judgments. Surely, one of the reasons He did not provide for them is that juries (like elections) place government policy and juridical determinations in the hands of an unpredictable and unequally yoked public, the majority of whom are not Christian (Matthew 7:13)….”
For more, see Chapter 6 “Article 3: Judicial Usurpation” of free online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at https://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html
Then Chapter 15 “Amendment 6: Speedy Trials, Public Trials, and Impartial Juries.”
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our 10-question Constitution Survey in the sidebar and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of “BL vs. USC.”