Categories
John Livingston

The Wolverines and the Vanishing Student Athlete

According to The Capital Sun, another conservation group has filed suit against the federal government, this time demanding that it finally designate “critical habitat” for the wolverine. The government, apparently, can’t begin to protect these rare northern carnivores until it first defines where they live.

It’s a fair point—and one that might just apply to another vanishing breed: the American college athlete.

The parallels are hard to miss. Fewer than 300 wolverines remain in the lower 48 states, ranging across frozen ridges and high mountain passes. Solitary creatures, they survive on the leftovers of bigger hunters. The modern college athlete, meanwhile, roams the digital tundra of the transfer portal, scavenging short‑term contracts and promotional scraps. Both species are in danger of losing what made them unique: the ability to survive for something larger than themselves.

Before we go further, a confession is in order. I am, and will always be, a Buckeye. Hatred of the Wolverine isn’t learned—it’s inherited, part of the Ohio genetic code. We grow up with it, like hay fever and an instinctive distrust of maize. For decades, we’ve viewed the Michigan Wolverine as the natural foe, a worthy adversary deserving both ridicule and respect.

But if we’re being honest, it’s hard to hate an endangered species.

Once upon a time, the Michigan man stood for excellence—on the field, in the classroom, and even in defeat. That big yellow “M” carried weight. It meant sacrifice, scholarship, and a certain nobility of purpose. But these days, the helmet shines brighter than the heart beneath it. The wolverine may still charge out of the tunnel, but he’s more likely sponsored by an energy drink than by institutional pride.

This is not simply a Michigan problem. It’s become a national one. Coaches and athletic directors—our so‑called conservationists—profess to protect the student‑athlete even as they bulldoze the habitat that sustains them. The NCAA, once the keeper of the flame, has become more of a ticket broker, moving players through an ecosystem dictated by streaming rights and donor boards.

The rise of Name‑Image‑Likeness (NIL) deals was supposed to empower athletes. Instead, it’s accelerated their extinction as students. The transactional model of college sports has turned loyalty into a liability and academics into a side hustle. If a player doesn’t start, he’s gone by spring. If he does start, a rival school—or a corporate sponsor—will outbid you by summer. The old beast of tradition has been gutted and skinned for content.

College programs now resemble wildlife parks—well‑funded enclosures where magnificent creatures perform for paying crowds. You can still spot a few true athletes: the walk‑on linebacker who stays four years, the forward who finishes her degree, the cross‑country runner still chasing something pure. But they are exceptions, rare as wolverines descending from the Rockies in sunlight.

Environmentalists want the federal government to act before the animal disappears entirely. Maybe the Department of Education should do the same before the “college student‑athlete” becomes a historical exhibit—a species that once symbolized teamwork, education, and character development, before being priced out by market forces.

Imagine a future generation asking, “Did they really go to class?” And we’ll nod wistfully. “Yes, they did. Between practices. Sometimes even on game days.” We’ll tell stories about rivalries that lasted decades and athletes who stayed long enough to earn degrees, not just signing bonuses.

Because when the last true Wolverine disappears, it won’t be just a Michigan tragedy—it will be an American one. We’ll have lost the spirit of competition grounded in learning, the amateur ideal that taught young men and women that playing for something bigger than themselves mattered more than money.

Extinction doesn’t come overnight. It creeps in through glossier uniforms, larger checks, and quieter classrooms. It arrives every time a coach says “brand” instead of “team.” It shows up when university presidents justify their balance sheets while ignoring their balance of purpose.

So yes, the wolverine deserves its critical habitat—and so does the college athlete. Without it, the wildness that once made college sports beautiful will vanish, leaving behind only curated highlights and empty trophies.

And maybe, just maybe, the rivalries that made autumn worth waiting for will fade too, replaced by something slicker, louder, but infinitely less human.

When the snow melts and the stadium lights dim, we may realize too late that both Wolverines—the one in the wilderness, and the one on the field—belonged to a rarer time, when survival meant more than sponsorship.

Save up to 30% on deals

3 replies on “The Wolverines and the Vanishing Student Athlete”

How can you support a plutocracy where everything is transactional and is stacked with billionaires and then complain about a system corrupted by money? Conservatives cut taxes mostly for the uber rich and take away help for the working class. Tuition keeps climbing and student loans are harder to get, but we must protect the student athlete because it is such a noble concept. It reminds me of how golf clubs banned pros because they were so common. Much like the Olympics that banned pros because amateurs were more pure some how. BS. A person has to eat and pay rent…the world is not a rich man’s club in spite of the feelings of the donor class. As long as we live in a country that bends over backwards to help the wealthy get richer and the poor stay poor, how can you impede atheletes who come from modest backgrounds to get some financial reward from their hard work and dedication to their craft?

Thank you, Calvin, for your comments.

The point is what happens to these “scholar athletes” athletes after they are done performing(?). There are 6000 college football players in all divisions who use up there elgibility very year. Only about 250 go on to play full time inn the NFL. The average full-time player in the NFL plays only for 2 years. At the end of 5 years 50% of these people are bankrupt, without a lifetime skill.

Who is supplicant and who is benefactor? Who is serving whom?

Thank you, Calvin, for your words and insight.

Only 250-300 college football players end up playing in the NFL out of over 3000 that run out of eligibility every year from all three NCAA divisions. The average longevity for a player in the NFL is two years. Five years after they stop playing 50% are bankrupt, even with NIL and high signing bonuses. By the time many are 30 years old, they are left without money, without a lifelong skill, and without a means to support their families.

The faculty lounges and sky boxes at big-time stadiums are filled with people who are knowingly exploiting young men and women. It should be the job of universities to help make them better people and to give them skills to be good providers and good citizens.

Fr. Hesbergh, while he was President of Notre Dame at a very different time and place in college sports, said that if an athlete goes to Notre Dame and graduates with a meaningful degree, they have used us. If they go to Notre Dame and don’t graduate with a meaningful degree or don’t graduate at all, we have used (exploited)jl them

Who is supplicant and who is benefactor in this system?
I recommend listening to Coach Nic Sabin’s comments on this subject that he made last Thursday at the White House.

Leave a Reply to Calvin Weaver Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gem State Patriot News