Now that the 9/11 remembrance ceremonies have been held on the 25th anniversary of that event, and we have once again kept those who were lost on that day in our hearts, it might be a time to reflect on questions that continue to linger for some.
It isn’t always easy listening to challenges of one’s beliefs. But a true critical thinker, regardless of deeply held beliefs, will always take a critical look at new information, give it consideration, then do the same, challenge that information as to its accuracies, or accept it.
One such challenge might be the suggestion that our government, in some way, could have had any involvement in the collapse of the buildings in New York on 9/11.
But that question is raised by architects, engineers, and firefighters. Not that the government had any involvement, but rather, asking for answers to questions that have been raised.
As the following information is considered, one needs to ask their own questions and challenge what is being presented. It should be scrutinized with a critical eye, then only dismissed as unplausible with counter arguments.
Firefighters for 9-11 Truth (FF911Truth) created a video in 2020, Calling Out Bravo-7, that details 9/11 from a firefighter’s perspective. The film primarily focuses on the World Trade Center 7 collapse which occurred later in the day on 9/11. It takes the viewer through the explanation given to the public for the collapse and the impossibility of that explanation, even addressing the challenge of accepting a new narrative. Other videos are available on the website.
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (ae911) is an organization of over 3,000 architects and engineers who, from an engineering standpoint, reject the findings of the 9/11 Commission. Many documentaries can be found on their website. The primary questions they raise, again from an engineering standpoint, are covered in this 3-part webinar series.
The International Center for 9/11 Justice also questions the official government narrative. This organization has created an outline of a Truth and Accountability Report it hopes to submit to the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and the Federal Special Grand Jury when the report is completed.
However, there are those who have been critical of and dispute this information as conspiracy theories.
This narrative can be a difficult pill to swallow, but that is all it is, a different narrative. It isn’t expected to be accepted, but rather, just given a critical eye as to its possibility.
