{"id":20218,"date":"2026-08-29T21:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-08-30T03:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/?p=20218"},"modified":"2026-08-29T21:40:59","modified_gmt":"2026-08-30T03:40:59","slug":"idaho-nuclear-waste-school-choice-the-prop-1-fight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/idaho-nuclear-waste-school-choice-the-prop-1-fight\/","title":{"rendered":"Idaho Nuclear Waste, School Choice & the Prop 1 Fight"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"Listen<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

This episode opens with a bone to pick: a federal plan the discussion says would reprocess fuel rods at the INL and accept a third of the nation\u2019s radioactive waste, atop the Snake River Aquifer. The episode recounts the 1950\u20131983 era of liquefied waste injected into the ground that reached the aquifer, invokes Three Mile Island and Chernobyl as cautionary \u201cit\u2019s safe\u201d promises, and notes plutonium-239\u2019s 24,000-year hazard. That alarm is set against a full-throated case for nuclear power as the only energy source efficient enough to meet future demand \u2014 with agreement on one point: Idaho should not be the nation\u2019s waste repository.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The middle of the episode turns to who pays and who decides. It questions an Idaho Power rate increase blamed on low water \u2014 asking why rates never fall in wet years \u2014 and airs frustration over cloud seeding, described as secretive enough that legislators are drafting measures to pause it pending more disclosure. The larger argument is structural: Idaho\u2019s state government is described as 40% dependent on federal dollars, and the episode contends the incentives reward politicians for bringing federal projects home \u2014 from Lava Ridge to data centers to a Micron expansion \u2014 rather than for asking what the electricity, water, and independence will cost. The prescription offered: let Idaho run Idaho.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode\u2019s centerpiece is a data-driven case for school choice. It describes Idaho\u2019s first-year program as a tax credit capped near 10,000 students, then argues from cited studies that an extra $1,000 per public-school student buys only about a 0.3% performance gain \u2014 five to six days of learning \u2014 while the same money spent on school choice is said to lift public-school students roughly twelve times as much through competition, with gains that compound over decades. Arizona\u2019s program is offered as evidence, and the episode calls for universal eligibility with no income test in the next legislative session. Two campaign fronts follow: crushing Prop 1, framed as a fight over unfettered abortion access with 1,500 lives a year claimed at stake, and turning that grassroots coalition toward eliminating property taxes by shrinking government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode closes with an Econ 101 lesson: because GDP counts government spending alongside consumption, investment, and net exports, expanding government mechanically makes the economy look healthier than people feel it is. That yardstick problem anchors the episode\u2019s revisionist history \u2014 the argument that FDR\u2019s spending extended rather than ended the Great Depression, while Coolidge inherited similar conditions, cut Wilson-era tax rates, and got the Roaring Twenties. Use the chapters below to jump straight to any fight \u2014 nuclear waste, school choice, Prop 1, property taxes, or the economics lesson.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

0:01 Introduction: Dispatch from the State Policy Network<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode opens remotely from Orlando, where the State Policy Network conference gathers 63 state-level think tanks and action tanks to compare notes and build alliances for limited-government policy. The Idaho Freedom Foundation is described as the only affiliate unique to Idaho, attending to learn what the state must do to keep its competitive edge as a beacon for freedom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

2:03 The INL Waste Deal and the Nuclear Energy Debate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A bone to pick with Idaho politicians lands on a federal plan the episode says would reprocess fuel rods at the INL and take a third of the nation\u2019s radioactive waste \u2014 into a site above the Snake River Aquifer and not exempt from earthquakes. The history cited: from 1950 to 1983, liquefied waste was put into the ground and reached the aquifer, a cleanup said to still be underway, with Three Mile Island and Chernobyl invoked as reminders of past \u201cit\u2019s safe\u201d assurances and plutonium-239\u2019s 24,000-year hazard raised. The counterargument holds that nuclear power is the answer to energy needs \u2014 wind, solar, and hydro can\u2019t match its efficiency \u2014 that waste volumes are remarkably small, and that the industry can crack the storage problem. Both sides of the exchange converge on one point: Idaho should not be the country\u2019s repository.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

8:11 Idaho Power Rate Hikes and Cloud Seeding Doubts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

An Idaho Power increase of perhaps 3%, attributed to low water, prompts the question of why rates never drop in wet years. Cloud seeding gets the same skeptical treatment \u2014 credited in wet years and dry years alike, which the episode argues means it can\u2019t be doing what\u2019s claimed. With Idahoans described as frustrated and fearful over the program\u2019s secrecy, the segment notes legislators are working on legislation or memorials to pause cloud seeding until more is disclosed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

9:48 Federal Dollars: Idaho\u2019s 40% Dependence Problem<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode argues Idaho\u2019s state government is 40% dependent on federal dollars and that the political incentives are upside down: officials are rewarded for bringing projects and money home, cutting ribbons, and posting about it \u2014 a dynamic captured with Milton Friedman\u2019s line about lining up incentives so the wrong people do the right things. The criticism extends to Lava Ridge, where the episode says only the Attorney General fought back, to data centers accepted without weighing electricity and water costs, and to a Micron expansion. The structural point is that as long as the reward is bringing dollars back, the spending never stops flowing out \u2014 so the fix proposed is a paradigm shift: don\u2019t send the dollars away in the first place, and let Idaho run Idaho.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

12:23 School Choice by the Numbers: The Case for a 12x Return<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Idaho\u2019s first-year school choice program is described as a tax credit capped near 10,000 students \u2014 people keeping more of their own money, not government dollars flowing to private schools. The episode\u2019s central claim, drawn from a conference session and cited studies: an extra $1,000 per public-school student yields roughly a 0.3% performance gain \u2014 five to six days of learning \u2014 while the same money on school choice is said to lift public-school students about twelve times as much, roughly 120 days, because competition pushes schools to step up, with gains that compound over decades. Arizona is offered as the proof case: after years of its program, about 10% of students are in private or home settings while the other 90% are said to do better than without school choice. The episode\u2019s argument is that opposition protects the establishment, not students, and it calls for universal eligibility with no income test in the next legislative session.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

22:15 Free Markets, Innovation, and the Electric-Car Grid<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A closing economics riff on school choice widens into a free-market argument: private industry produced innovations no one could have imagined \u2014 self-driving electric cars among them \u2014 that government, given the same task a century ago, never would have delivered. Skeptical counterpoints get an airing too: the electricity required to charge a national EV fleet and the thin charging network, illustrated by a driver who must stop in Boise to make the trip from Salt Lake. The rejoinder is that nobody had to artificially build the gasoline-station network either \u2014 the market finds a way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

24:51 Stop Prop 1: Rallying Against the Abortion Ballot Measure<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode frames the campaign against Prop 1 as a fight over innocent lives, claiming conservatives are more united than at any time in memory and that a growing grassroots network can crush the measure the way ranked choice voting was crushed. The stated goals: show that 70% of Idahoans want nothing to do with what the episode calls unfettered access to abortion, and save what it claims are 1,500 lives a year. A warning comes with the optimism \u2014 no one should relax; everyone has to do the work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

27:03 After Prop 1: Targeting Property Taxes and Budget Growth<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the Prop 1 coalition wins, the episode wants it aimed next at eliminating property taxes \u2014 answering the replace-the-revenue question with \u201creduced government,\u201d on the claim that government is swimming in more money than it needs. A cited figure of $7 billion in budget growth over seven to eight years anchors the case that a few years of fiscal discipline could reverse course. The argument runs that government expansion misallocates resources, and the opportunity cost only becomes visible once spending is dialed back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

28:35 Econ 101: How Government Spending Pads GDP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

A short macroeconomics lesson walks through gross domestic product as the sum of consumption \u2014 nearly 70% of the total \u2014 business investment, net exports, and government spending, the same four categories listed on the Federal Reserve\u2019s website. The warning flag is structural: because government purchases count as production, spending surges during recessions mechanically make the economy look better than it is, even when that spending merely displaces the private sector. The result, the episode argues, is that the numbers improve while the people don\u2019t feel it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

32:41 FDR vs. Coolidge: Rereading the Great Depression<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The episode makes the case that FDR did not rescue the country from the Great Depression but extended it by eight to ten years, redirecting spending from the private sector to government and earning, in the episode\u2019s ranking, a bottom-two presidency rather than a top-five one. The offered counterfactual: Coolidge inherited nearly identical conditions \u2014 unemployment approaching 10%, falling prices, collapsing investment \u2014 and instead of a New Deal cut income tax rates from Wilson-era 70% down to about 14 or 15%, producing the Roaring Twenties. The segment closes on top rates reaching 90% in the 1960s and the question of who works for another dollar when they keep a dime of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

36:11 Closing: Legislators Beyond Listening<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Twenty-five years of teaching college students is contrasted with lecturing legislators, who the episode says are beyond the point of listening \u2014 invoking a Reagan line that the problem isn\u2019t ignorance but knowing so much that isn\u2019t so. That, the discussion concludes, is why the foundation and the show exist: to spread the truth past the false notions people hold about how the economy works. The episode signs off warmly with a promise to talk again next week \u2014 and a warning about ravenous Florida gators.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Listen<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This episode opens with a bone to pick: a federal plan the discussion says would reprocess fuel rods at the INL and accept a third of the nation\u2019s radioactive waste, atop the Snake River Aquifer. The episode recounts the 1950\u20131983 era of liquefied waste injected into the ground that reached the aquifer, invokes Three Mile […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1502],"tags":[11,154,1150],"class_list":["post-20218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-podcast","tag-abortion","tag-nuclear-waste","tag-school-choice","cat-1502-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20218"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20218\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20219,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20218\/revisions\/20219"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}