One perfect place to execute this plan is in Montana, called the Missouri Headwaters Conservation Area<\/a>. While this map shows the boundary map clearly within the Montana border, it isn’t clear what that red boundary line extending into Idaho means, but it does capture Centennial Valley<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n First some background, but one almost needs some sort of economic background to get the gist of what is being done. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Globalists began looking at the environment as having “Natural Assets<\/a>“, meaning the environment could be used as justification for economic gain. a “key<\/a> to sustainable development”. Natural assets are defined<\/a> as assets of the natural environment that consist of wild or produced biological assets, land, water, ecosystems, subsoil, and air. Basically anything in the environment. These assets are sometimes called “ecosystem services<\/a>“. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Using climate change hysteria, globalists plotted the latest snow job called Nature Based Solutions (NBS). Since climate change allegedly destroys everything, NBS “are actions<\/a> to protect, sustainably manage, or restore natural ecosystems”, or natural assets, especially if those solutions address societal challenges such as water security and disaster risk reduction, while providing biodiversity benefits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Alas, since natural solutions receive little financing<\/a> for preventing greenhouse gas emissions, globalists designed a new financial market that uses the environment for economic gain. The White House is on board<\/a> with its National Strategy<\/a> plan. Initial funding for this atrocity came out of the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act<\/a> which was really intended to fundamentally transform America towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG<\/a>). <\/p>\n\n\n\n On page 112<\/a>, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was allocated $1 billion for a “pre-disaster mitigation program” which of course will be used<\/a> for nature based solutions<\/a>, promising “monetary…benefits…economic growth, green jobs, increased property values and better public health”, all hornswoggle. In this April, 2022 Executive Order 14072<\/a>, Section 4, the administration announced its plan for nature based solutions, which was followed in November, 2022 by the White House Nature Based Solutions Resource Guide<\/a>. Of course this idea didn’t come from the people, it came out of the United Nations (UN) COP 27<\/a> as a way to fight “climate change<\/a>” and increase resilience to life. Ah yes, this president’s brilliance<\/a> will lead to protection for all. And the World Economic Forum (WEF) is drooling<\/a> over how much money corporations can suck from us with this sham they created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Heck, the White House has already put into place a “roadmap<\/a>” to assist moneygrubbing schmuck globalists by “Unlocking funding for domestic and international projects, and encouraging Federal agencies to do more to prioritize nature-based solutions in funding decisions.” For those who are morbidly curious, a full review of potential funding avenues can be found here<\/a>. No matter which way you look at it, the cost will be borne by us serfs to the elite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The really tough part in understanding this is how profits are made. One thing for sure, it does involve<\/a> restoration, protection, and conservation of nature. But money<\/a> will be made now that new economic markets have been created.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Natural Asset Companies (NAC<\/a>) were created<\/a> for this specific purpose<\/a>, “to develop an asset class that converts the value of nature and the ecoservices designed to sustain it into financial capital.” An NAC allows “investors to financially back services that directly benefit the planet”. Intrinsic Exchange Groups (IEG<\/a>) are a type of company “whose equity captures the value<\/u><\/strong> of natural assets and the ecosystem services they produce.” IEG basically determines how much value will be assigned to nature. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Wall Street is on board<\/a> but Whitney Webb hit the nail on the head, “The ultimate goal of NACs is not sustainability or conservation \u2013 it is the financialization of nature, i.e. turning nature into a commodity that can be used to keep the current, corrupt Wall Street economy booming under the guise of protecting the environment and preventing its further degradation”, her words validated by this author<\/a>. It is nothing more than another form<\/a> of Environment, Social Governance (ESG<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n This author<\/a> does a fine job in explaining with one example how to make money<\/a> from this scam when it comes to water. Buy property, create a mitigation bank (buy cheap land and restore it to some ecological state that’s deemed to be functional), and investors come in. As he explains it, it is like building houses only you are building wetlands. It is no wonder<\/a> the corporate saturated WEF supports<\/a> NBS. The World Bank<\/a> might have given NBS a more appropriate name in this video<\/a>, “green infrastructure”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Enough of the economic lesson, back to Montana. The American Stewards for Liberty wrote an article<\/a> about this land grab by the feds, indicating that central Idaho will be involved in it. While the article describes the agenda to connect protected lands together in Montana, Idaho is in the crosshairs<\/a> for the same expansion<\/a>, that area being within the red box in the map. Private land will also be usurped in this scam whether voluntary or not and property owners will be forced to comply with restricted and controlled land use. Private property rights will go down the drain. The article also talks about NACs and describes hybrid<\/a> areas as part of the plan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the end of the article there is an excellent link<\/a> that explains how this whole scheme is only about monetizing nature, and notes the same bewilderment, “no investment professional can explain how investors will make money”, but rest assured, these scallywag globalists are figuring it out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Both the USFWS<\/a> and Bureau of Land Management<\/a> have conservation areas. However, according to the Department of Interior<\/a> “national conservation areas are designated by Congress” (page CRS-8<\/a>) and only by the Bureau of Land Management, not the USFWS. Is the USFWS using a slight of hand by leaving out “national” or mixing national in with other wording<\/a>? Or is this really just another White House violation of the law?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Public scoping on this action ends November 27, 2023. The American Stewards article has recommendations for action at the end. Although the deadline for amendments has passed<\/a>, H.R. 4821<\/a>, sponsored by Rep. Mike Simpson<\/a>, has little chance of passing. Regardless, Idahoans should contact congressional representatives (especially Simpson<\/a>) and state representatives, ask them what Idaho can do for protection against this 30×30 agenda, the proposed conservation area, and ban NAC activity. Perhaps everyone should consider putting together a bill for state reps to sponsor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/gemstatepatriot.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/proposed_missouri_headwaters_conservation_area_project_boundary_map-791x1024.webp\"){kind=spacer}
<\/a>