Understanding Idaho House Bill 1
A Conversation with Ron Nate, IFF President, & Tea Party Bob
LISTEN HERE: IdahoRadio.com
Idaho’s legislature is currently considering what could become the nation’s most comprehensive school choice program. House Bill H.001, sponsored by Representative Clint Hostetler, proposes a groundbreaking approach to education funding that would offer refundable tax credits of up to $9,500 per child for non-public education expenses.
A “Gold Standard” for School Choice
The proposed legislation sets itself apart through three key features that make it a potential model for other states. First, it offers universal accessibility – any family in Idaho can participate, regardless of income level. Second, it maintains educational autonomy by avoiding excessive regulations on private schools and homeschooling options. Third, the generous credit amount of up to $9,500 per student makes private education financially feasible for many families.
“If adopted, no other state would have school choice that comes anywhere close to what Idaho’s is proposing,” explains Ron Nate, president of the Idaho Freedom Foundation. “We want private schools to be able to innovate and come up with new ideas and better ideas.”
Financial Implications and Savings
While Idaho currently spends $9,308 per student in state funding – the lowest among all 50 states – the total per-student expenditure reaches approximately $13,000 when including local and federal funds. The proposed tax credit system could actually generate savings for the state while expanding educational options for families.
The bill includes a $250 million annual cap on tax credits, subject to legislative review. However, initial projections suggest actual usage might be closer to $100 million in the early years. “We put it way high because we didn’t want anyone to be shut out of the program who wanted to be included in it,” Nate explains.
Implementation and Innovation
The transition to this new system would likely be gradual, allowing private education capacity to grow organically. The bill’s framework encourages various educational models, from traditional private schools to innovative micro-schools and homeschool co-ops where families share educational responsibilities.
Private schools and educational entrepreneurs would have the freedom to develop new teaching methodologies and curricula without being constrained by state-mandated standards or testing requirements. This flexibility could lead to more personalized education options tailored to individual student needs.
Addressing Concerns
Critics, particularly teachers’ unions, have expressed concerns about the potential impact on public school enrollment and funding. However, proponents argue that competition will ultimately benefit both private and public education sectors. “No parent would choose to take their student away from public school if it was working well,” notes Nate, suggesting that the program would primarily serve families currently underserved by the traditional system.
The bill includes provisions to protect both private schools and homeschooling families from additional government regulation, explicitly prohibiting new oversight measures that could compromise educational independence.
Economic Context and Fiscal Responsibility
The program’s funding could be offset by reducing or eliminating other educational initiatives. For instance, the state currently spends $70 million annually on the Idaho Launch program and has seen significant increases in other educational programs, such as the K-3 reading program, which has grown from $5 million to approximately $73 million.
Looking Forward
As the bill moves through the legislative process, its success may depend on finding the right balance between maintaining its core principles and addressing stakeholders’ concerns. The legislation represents a significant shift in educational policy, potentially positioning Idaho as a national leader in educational freedom and innovation.
If passed, this legislation could fundamentally transform Idaho’s educational landscape, offering families unprecedented choice in their children’s education while potentially reducing overall educational spending through market efficiencies and competition.
LISTEN HERE: IdahoRadio.com
4 replies on “Will Idaho Boldly Move Toward Educational Freedom of Choice?”
The CDA school district lost 10% of their enrollment the fall of 2020 and still haven’t recovered with ANY enrollment increases since. The parents have voted with their feet. The school board closed a school and whining every day about lack of money.
Let us see if the legislature has the same resolve and common sense as the parents.
Good intent, but a bit of caution. One of Trumps expressed intent is to end the DOE and return the money to the states. You both know the degradation imposed on our children by the imposition of K12 in controlll of the progressive DOE for the past 50 years and are aware of the limited ability of their parents. If Trump wins who will spend the money?
Good intent, but a bit of caution. One of Trumps expressed intents is to end the DOE and return the money to the states. You both know the degradation imposed on our children by the imposition of K12 in controlll of the progressive DOE for the past 50 years and are aware of the limited ability of their parents. If Trump wins who will spend the money?
Good intent especially with the supposed protections from “additional government regulation”. However, since now there is NO REGULATION in Idaho for home schools, what is to stop a future legislature from ADDING regulations to anyone who takes this money? The argument is “well it IS “our” money, so “we” need to know if your child is actually learning (which is truly a joke given the sad status of education in the public sector) As much as I didn’t like having to pay for BOTH public schools and my own family’s education, to keep my decision FREE from ANY government regulation, I would do it again.