Timothy Noah in his article “Bill Clinton and the Meaning of ‘Is’,” at Slate.com states:
“Years from now, when we look back on Bill Clinton’s presidency, its defining moment may well be Clinton’s rationalization to the grand jury about why he wasn’t lying when he said to his top aides that with respect to Monica Lewinsky, “there’s nothing going on between us.” How can this be? Here’s what Clinton told the grand jury (according to footnote 1,128 in Starr’s report):
“‘It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement… Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true.’
“The distinction between “is” and “was” was seized on by the commentariat when Clinton told Jim Lehrer of PBS right after the Lewinsky story broke, “There is no improper relationship.” Chatterbox confesses that at the time he thought all these beltway domes were hyper analyzing, and in need of a little fresh air. But it turns out they were right: Bill Clinton really is a guy who’s willing to think carefully about “what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.” This is way beyond slick. Perhaps we should start calling him, “Existential Willie.”
See the video ‘Bill Clinton: His Life‘ on why Bill Clinton really ‘isn’t’ at all what you might think he is. The video will blow your mind if you think he’s a good guy and you need to watch it all. It’s incredible that he’s not in prison! What a testimonial to sheer power and corruption!
Today there is so much deception, spin and outright lies being fed us by a complicit media on behalf of the Clintons, Obama and the deceitful, corrupt UN and their comrades at the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) who actually are the establishment, we can just about count on what they say is, really isn’t.
They are steering us into giving up our sovereignty to become firstly a member of a regional government on our way to full membership in a One World Government run by unaccountable, unelected power elitists who know best for everyone about everything. Pure socialism, which has never been successful anywhere in the world. Can you say USSR, Cuba or Venezuela?
A PRIME EXAMPLE OF WHEN IS, ISN’T — FROM THE DEMOCRATS
Cites Warren Mass in his article in The New American magazine ‘Democratic Platform Proposes Two Constitutional Amendments and UN Treaty Ratification:’
…”The 2016 Democratic Party Platform urges U.S. ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) — an international treaty adopted in 1979 by UN General Assembly.
“As was pointed out in an article posted by The New American in 2010, CEDAW is “a treaty that could be used to justify sweeping social engineering across the nation.” That article quoted from an exposé written by Christina Hoff Sommers at National Review, which revealed that the most damaging aspect of CEDAW is how it defines discrimination: as any distinction based on sex.
“Sommers offers the following as an example of the intrusive behavior practiced by UN bureaucrats toward people in countries that have ratified CEDAW:
“Under CEDAW, even private behavior such as how couples divide household and child-care chores is subject to government oversight and modification. The U.N. monitoring committee routinely censures countries like Denmark, “Norway, and Iceland for failing to prevent women from taking primary care of children, a practice it deems discriminatory.
“Sommers also outlined other problems with the treaty:
“‘American law is based on the ideal of equal opportunity; CEDAW demands equal outcomes…. Groups such as NOW, the Feminist Majority Foundation, and the National Women’s Law Center view a ratified CEDAW as a legal mandate to implement their agenda in the United States. For them, the treaty is a license to sue, re-educate, and re-socialize their fellow citizens — opportunities that have eluded them under the U.S. Constitution.
“‘These three proposals — two to amend our Constitution to erode freedom of speech and radically change the social structure of our nation, and the third to entangle the United States in a UN treaty that would subject American families to the arbitrary dictates of UN bureaucrats — are what one might expect to come from a political party that would nominate Hillary Clinton as their candidate for president. As such, they may not be surprising, but that does not make them any less threatening.'” – Unquote Warren Mass
HOW TO KNOW WHEN IS, REALLY IS
Americans need to be ‘reality focused’ and mindful of real vetted ‘original source’ news, like never before, which is sorely non-existent from the unscrupulous establishment’s locked-in-step big media partners.
Don’t count on a thing politicians say, only believe what you see them actually do and judge them on how they vote!
There’s a very simple way of identifying which elected representatives need replacing in our Idaho statehouse and in Congress in Washington. You study The Freedom Indexes for both bodies which shows exactly how they vote with criteria in keeping with the Constitution and then cull them at the voting box. Here in Idaho The Freedom Index is published by IdahoFreedomIndex.com by ‘The Idaho Freedom Foundation.’
For the U.S. Congress see “The Freedom Index at JBS.org: A Congressional Scorecard Based on the U.S. Constitution” rates congressmen based on their adherence to constitutional principles of limited government, fiscal responsibility, national sovereignty, and a traditional foreign policy of avoiding foreign entanglements. In the third index for the 114th Congress, here is how abysmally our congressmen and senators in Washington, D.C. voted with the Constitution: U.S. House 45% and U.S. Senate 32%. So there you see now why we are where we are.
The terrible voting records revealed in the two The Freedom Indexes, is exactly the explanation for why we are rapidly becoming a socialistic society and our Republic is in danger of evolving into losing our national sovereignty. We must start educating ourselves and informing others and do right at the voting booths. If we lose America, and believe it or not, we most certainly can (think frog in pot of slowly boiling water) chances are it will not come back without a very, very bloody conflict that will make our Civil War pale in comparison.
The global power elitists are very serious and are extremely well prepared, have mapped us out and fully intend to wrap us up. It is extremely important for us to always know that ‘what is really is!’ See: Who the ‘Establishment’ Really Is